First off, some video footage from the rally in Mississippi — special thanks to ostinsfriend for sharing this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiSj1YW_E8Q
A reader of Andrew Sullivan’s The Daily Dish wrote:
I’m not gay. I don’t have gay friends or family. This isn’t about homosexuality. This is about civil rights.
I attended the rally in Portland, ME (no pictures, sorry) with my wife and 4 year old son. A lovely older gay woman in the crowd thanked me for coming, and I thanked her right back. I don’t support gay marriage as a favor to gays, and I’m not owned anything for fighting discrimination. We don’t–we shouldn’t–need to rely on gays, on friends and families of gays, to ensure equal rights for all Americans.
I’ve got no special affinity for the gay community, but I’m an American and a patriot: I’ve got a special affinity for my fellow Americans. I’ll be damned if I acquiesce to such shameful hate and discrimination.
There have been many stories in the media about the protests this weekend, but I’ve found the reports from protesters themselves to be far more intriguing. To that end, click on for links to photos, video, and personal accounts from all over the world.
Continue reading ‘Personal Accounts from Join the Impact’
Commentary: Love is a [legal] battlefield.
Published November 18, 2008 Commentary Leave a CommentTags: Baker v. Nelson, california supreme court, Citizens for Equal Protection et al. v. Jon C. Bruning, civil rights, defense of marriage act, doma, Full Faith and Credit Clause, In re Marriage Cases, Lawrence v. Texas, Loving v. Virginia, prop 8, proposition 8, Strauss v. Horton
The above excerpt is from the U.S. Supreme Court (Warren) unanimous opinion on Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 landmark case that abolished the ban on interracial marriage. Over four decades later, we find ourselves fighting once again for the rights that are so “fundamental to our very existence and survival.”
Continue reading ‘Commentary: Love is a [legal] battlefield.’